Friday, December 3, 2010

Socialism Not Isolationism (by Ken Curran)

Parliament In The Dark

Monday' Opposition Day Debate in the Commons on the Coalition's massive cuts which are planned in central grants to local authorities over the next four years, provides an opportunity for Labour to point out the global nature of the current financial crisis. For it is the overall economic climate which is used by the Government to attack public spending.

It is time, however, for Labour to tell some home truths. The economic crisis arose thanks to an ignorance in economic and financial affairs by politicians of all political parties. Not just in Britain but world wide. The role of the banks was the stimulus in creating the crisis. A sign of blindness and ignorance at the size of the gathering storm.

Labour should look seriously at itself afresh, for at one time it believed that capitalism had the potential to lead us into just such an economic and social disaster. To ignore the history of the part played by the banks over the 1920s and 30s beggars belief. We have to admit that Labour played a major part in creating the crisis. Whilst Gordon Brown eventually took steps to try and avoid a total collapse of world trade, we still remain in a position of great uncertainty.

Politicians of different shades appear to behave as if they understand the nature of the beast they are attempting to tame, yet increasing numbers of the general public are beginning to doubt whether any of them know what they are talking about. Public doubts about the quality and nature of our democracy are not surprising given the nature of the performance of many of our MPs in recent years. It will take more than one election to erase the memories of the expenses scandal. There is the disgrace of the recent behaviour of Nick Clegg over the question of Student Fees in his signing the Student's Petition whilst at the same time his colleague Danny Alexander was in secret talks with the Tories about the possibility of going into coalition with them if a hung parliament arose. Clegg and his colleagues deceived a generation of young people, many of them voting for the first time. Clegg has done an enormous damage to politicians and the concept of democracy as well as to his own Party.

Acting alone the Labour Party can not substantially alter the performance of the global market even to fulfil its own modest demands. Labour and other Democratic Socialist Parties need to act in concert in order to mount the maximum pressure upon the world's financial system. It is misleading the electorate to claim that the practices of the global market can be dealt with in isolation.

I see political isolationism as the great fault line in Social Democratic thinking. It is the biggest obstacle to creating a stable economic economy. This is perhaps the reason why Social Democrats fail to maintain and sustain electoral success.

The decline in the influence of Social Democratic and Democratic Socialist Parties across the world is due to the lack of a collective vision and a collective message. These parties continually sing from different hymn sheets. It is hardly the best way to sell an alternative message. It gives the electorate the impression that we know what we are against, but not what we are for.

I accept that in the course of political debate differences of approach and opinion will emerge. All of us have a duty to conduct ourselves in a responsible manner. Unfortunately in the recent past some who are (or have been regarded themselves) as leading members of the Labour Party have only been too keen to speak to the media as though they were the fountain of all knowledge and wisdom in our movement.
The preview by the Guardian of Ed Miliband's address to the National Policy Forum as he unveils his Policy Enquiries pointed out that he would warn that the same old stance will not restore trust in the Party. He promises that the Party will engage in what he describes as a million conversations to reconnect to a disillusioned public. Perhaps there is the chance of a Renaissance of Labour. New Labour led us into what eventually turned into a minefield. Our leaders disregarded our Party Values. Some even indulged themselves in behaviour unbecoming to a Party of high ideals. Let us hope that we emerge from the morass, some of which has been our own doing. We can learn from our past mistakes and still build on the ideals of Keir Hardie (photo above, addressing a rally at Trafalgar Square), Clem Attlee, Nye Bevan, Barbara Castle, Robin Cooke and many more. They all had their faults, but none of them would have advocated CASINOS as a means of improving society.

Ken Curran, Sheffield District Labour Party, Chair Sheffield Branch of the Co-op Party.

Saturday, November 27, 2010

How Is Labour To Become The "People's Party" Again ?


Ed Miliband (above) has called on Labour activists to take the term 'big society' back from the Conservatives and for Labour to become the "people's party" again.

Launching a major policy review, he said the party must move beyond New Labour to reconnect with the public's aspirations after "losing its way". See here for the details. Then see here for his earlier letter to the Dronfield Labour Party Discussion Group.

This policy review will be at the centre of our next Discussion Meeting which is to be addressed by Richard Caborn (below). For details of that meeting see our right hand column.

Saturday, November 20, 2010

What Matters Most Is How We Think

Our last discussion meeting was addressed by Danny Dorling (see photo) and was previewed here.

His telling talk covered the subject matter of his fine book "Injustice : Why Social Equality Persists" which was published earlier this year.

Danny stimulated a fine discussion and a lot of serious thinking. Thirty people attended on a Sunday evening and there was general agreement on the significance of the meeting.

Earlier he was interviewed for the radio programme "Little Atoms". Just click here to listen to the telling nature of what he has to say. In his book he argues "...what matters most is how we think". Stimulating the type of thinking he is after is, of course, exactly what our discussion meetings are about. So we could not have had a better speaker. We now know much better what we are up to.

Monday, November 15, 2010

The Business of the Committee

This is Natascha Engel our local MP in North East Derbyshire. Soon after the General Election, the Commons established its first ever Backbench Business Committee and Natascha was elected in a ballot by MPs from both sides of the House to serve as Chair of the new Committee. Towards the end of the last Parliament a vigorous debate took place in the Commons as to whether such a Committee should be established and, if so, what its make-up and powers should be. In December, Natascha addressed our Discussion Meeting on the issue. As a consequence, over the following three months we ran a series of items on the matters involved which can be found here, here, here and here. Natascha has written an article on the role and workings of the new Committee which is published today in the MPs' own journal "The House Magazine". This is a crucial update on an issue which our discussion group has carefully been following. The purpose of this present item is to provide a link to her own key update. It can be found here. On the 18th of November 2010 she also made a speech on the issue shown in this video.

Unbelievabubble

For a description of what happened at 10 Downing Street the day that Margaret Thatcher resigned, this is not to be missed. It gives hope for those working for the end of the present Coalition Government.

I first found out about Thatcher's resignation in the cloakroom of the House of Commons when a gleeful Tory MP, the late Geoffrey Johnson Smith beckoned me over to read the news on a teleprinter. He was a Tory who certainly wasn't crying. He was as joyful as a Sunderland Supporter who had just watched his team win 3-0 at Chelsea. How many Tories will be like that when the Coalition ends?

Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Injustice : Why Social Inequality Persists

Daniel Dorling is Professor of Human Geography at Sheffield University. Earlier this year Policy Press published his latest book "Injustice : Why Social Inequality Persists". He is to address the next meeting of the Dronfield Labour Party Discussion Group on this key topic at 8pm on Sunday, 14 November.

Simon Jenkins has described him as "Geographer Royal by Appointment to the Left".

Richard Wilkinson co-author of "The Spirit Level" states "beliefs which serve privilege, elitism and inequality infect our minds like computer viruses. But now Dorling provides the brain-cleaning software we need to begin creating a happier society".

His book has also been described as "at least the equal of The Spirit Level" in this review. Whilst Nancy Krieger of the Harvard School of Public Health states "for injustice to flourish, inequality must appear as natural, normal, innate and inevitable. Danny Dorling, in this impassioned, empirical, and hopeful book, skewers ideologies that justify injustice - and reminds us that a necessary step towards creating a better world is collectively imagining it is possible."

Daniel Dorling who undermines the five modern tenets of injustice, viz:

•elitism is efficient;
•exclusion is necessary;
•prejudice is natural;
•greed is good; and
•despair is inevitable.

Thursday, September 30, 2010

If I Was Labour's Leader...

If I were Labour's newly elected leader in addition to seeing the need to rebuild the Labour Party to become a mass party with wide support in society, I would at the same time seek to internationalise the debate on what democratic socialism means and get beyond our domestic scene.

Trying to tame or regulate capitalism from our own perspective is not possible. Nor is it possible to influence changes in public behaviour sufficiently over climate change, future famines and shortages of water and raw materials unless we seek to internationalise the debate. This is why we need to start a wide debate with fellow democratic socialists in order to develop an international strategy.

In a blog item at Labour List which I otherwise identify with, there is no mention by Jon Wilson of "Labour Values" of the need for an international dialogue on either the banking crisis or climate change and its attendant problems such as drought and famine. Whilst unlike George Monbiot (the Guardian's Climate Change Correspondent) who accepts the inevitability of being unable to sufficiently influence world opinion on these matters, I believe that as socialists we can and must continue to pursue the long term objective of defeating ignorance, famine and poverty.
The last phase of the Climate Change debate in Copenhagen ended in failure due to the influences of capitalist doctrines. We must combine together with as many men and women as possible of political goodwill across the globe to confront the forces of greed, which regrettably the banks and many other institutions across the globe have come to represent. Unfortunately the Social Democrats and Socialists have lost political power in many countries across Europe. I believe that this is largely due to them losing their way in the same manner as New Labour.

Democratic Socialism and Global Capitalism are not natural bedfellows. Capitalism is the antithesis of Democratic Socialism. This is not my being doctrinaire, but genuinely stating a fact. In the same way science tells us that oil and water don't mix, you cannot get socialism and capitalism to blend. But one can exercise controls over the other.

So even if we accept that capitalism has produced technical advances which have at times benefited temporally privileged groups of people, then we have to finds ways to see that such benefits go to all people throughout the world. Substantial controls, restraints, redirection and transformation have to be placed on the writ of capitalism if we are to start to save the world and make it safer for future generations. Changes that we will have to work on continuously to produce a situation that enables us to develop a world which is finally free from the dominance of capitalism's greed and exploitation.

We all have our own histories and cultures, but the thing we now have and share in common is the currently uncontrollable behaviour of global capitalism. If we don't find solutions to control that behaviour, then I do fear the worst for humanity.

We can't, however, just depend on one set of regulations to control global capitalism. As John Kay said in the Financial Times on September 14th this year -"Serious reform must begin with a realistic assessment of what regulations can achieve. Regulations can observe compliance with prescribed procedures - and that is really what they mostly do - but have a very limited ability or opportunity to assess what behaviour is prudent." Only eternal vigilance and understanding can shape what regulations are needed when.

The new generation of politicians which Ed Miliband speaks of have some enormous challenges that require their urgent attention. For humanities sake they must not fail. Room for manoeuvre in today's world is very limited. I repeat my earlier warning in Dronfield Blather, Global Capitalism left to its own devices has the potential to kill the human race.

Ken Curran, Chair Sheffield Co-operative Party and Sheffield District Labour Party.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Dronfield's Message From Ed Miliband


During the campaign for the election of the new Labour Leader, Dronfield Blather received the following letter from Ed Miliband. We have added links to the items from his web-site which he refers us to.

"Thank you for your letter and the views of the signatories to the statement you attach. I agree that we need now to have a serious discussion about what we got wrong in Government, and how we should stand up to the Coalition while preparing for a return to power. I have said repeatedly that I believe we need to put our core values at the heart of everything we do.

Early on in the campaign I set out my vision for the future direction of our Party, which I hope meets the requirements for your Manifesto of Intent. In a speech in Leeds, I reflected on the reasons behind our defeat in May and set out how we can learn lessons and reach out to the country again. A few weeks later, I gave a speech outlining how the Labour Party can adapt to 21st social democracy, to become a living, breathing party of progressive change. You can find both of these speeches on my website www.edmiliband.org

It could be a long road to the next General Election, but the change has to start now. In Government we sometimes seemed to lose a sense of the values that should always shape Labour's mission. As leader, I would put these values back at the heart of everything we do.

I want to lead a Party that actively turns its values into reality, to improve people's lives. We need to be ready to offer a better vision to the electorate. We need to have already shown by our actions and arguments that Britain needs a different kind of economy in which new manufacturing and small businesses are prized.

We can only do that by listening to our party and building a movement for change. I would appreciate your support to make this happen.

With best wishes,
Ed Miliband."

Friday, September 24, 2010

Lib Dems Crash In Dronfield

The Lib Dems suffered a crushing defeat in yesterday's District Council By-election in the Gosforth Valley Ward of the North East Derbyshire District Council.

In this three seater in 2007 the average results of the Political Parties were Lib Dems 51.1%, Tories 30.0% and Labour 18.9%.

The By-election was a contest for a single seat. The Liberal Vote fell dramatically to 31.3%, the Tories took 37.1% and Labour moved into second place with 31.6%.

The Liberal percentage vote fell by 19.8% with 7.1% of these going to the Tories and 12.7% to Labour. The Liberal swing to Labour was almost twice as strong as the swing to the Tories.

Although the turnout dropped substantially from 36% in 2007 to 26%, the Labour vote actually increased from a previous average of 315 to 354. It was its best ever result in the ward.

Whilst Labour only moved into 2nd place by 4 votes, it overtook the Lib Dems who had had an average lead over them of no less than 563 in 2007.

If the By-election had been fought under the Alternative Vote, then the Lib Dems would have been eliminated and their second choices redistributed between Labour and the Tories. Labour would have needed just 207 of the potential 350 transferred votes to ensure victory. That is under 3 in 5 of the transfers.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Don't Gamble With The Future

On the 3rd of September I attended a demonstration called by the Sheffield Trade Union Council. This was in the form of a public meeting outside the Town Hall. This was a protest demonstration against the Con-Lib Dem Coalition's budget to address the current financial situation. A crisis brought about by the free market, no rules capitalism that has spread across the world over the past decade. The demonstration was supported by the Sheffield District Labour Party, Sheffield Labour Councillors, Paul Bloomfield MP for Sheffield Central, Sheffield Green Party, Youth Workers (92 of whom are to lose their jobs as a result of budget cuts), Sheffield Pensioners Action Group, hospital workers worried about the future of the NHS, school teachers and government workers from various offices across the City.

The crowd numbered 500 or more. This was a good turnout for a Friday early evening 5.30pm demonstration in the kind of hedonistic pleasure seeking City Sheffield is tending to these days. "Forget the problems of the world and lets have another drink" seems to be the prevailing culture. We tend to live in an anaesthetised society. Drink, drugs, television, sport, entertainment; each one diverts the mind. Reality cannot be faced, because the facts are too stark! That said it was a pleasant surprise that over 500 people turned up for the event from different walks of life. For over an hour we were able to make "common cause" and unite against the very nature of the greedy and increasingly intolerant society Britain has become.

After a decade of near silence (apart from electioneering and leafleting) the Sheffield District Labour Party are once more beginning to participate in the protests and street politics of the City. Over the years of New Labour they found themselves bound hand and foot by the Machiavellian machinations of Blairism. The great lesson which I hope has or is being learnt is that even when Labour is in office, still the Party has an important role beyond campaigning for Labour Candidates. That role is to act as a conduit for feeding into the Party the views of the people, not acting in the way Blairites had of only listening to those who had been carefully vetted. That became part of the great undoing of Gordon Brown when he ran into Mrs Duffy of Rochdale. This told him what Labour canvassers were facing on a daily basis. Ordinary party members ought to be the political watchdogs of the Party, feeding in to the Party public opinion, not just sending out the latest "On Message" so slavishly followed, even though as individuals we have little faith in the message.

One of the problems that Labour faces within the Party is tolerance, for those who feel they need to question the Party bureaucracy, policy or our elected representatives. Instead they are often regarded as trouble-makers or heaven forbid extremists. What these prevalent attitudes clearly identify is the need for some fundamental political education in the Party over what Democratic Socialism is all about. Without this basic knowledge, discussion remains at a very primitive level.
In Sheffield and elsewhere people are joining the Party, even some of our old disgruntled members are returning. We must ensure they are joining a political party that has or is genuinely learning from its past mistakes. Tony Blair's book A Journey tells a story that should be an object lesson to us all. How could a mentally dysfunctional messianic person rise to become leader of the Labour Party? While Labour did achieve some good things under his very strange form of leadership, by far the greatest beneficiaries of his years of Premiership has been Mr and Mrs Blair. Only Blair in his first year as Labour Leader described himself as the New Keir Hardie, when in effect he was the direct opposite.Returning to the subject of the September 3rd demonstration, I was struck by the significance of the date. It was on September 3rd 1939 when Britain declared war on Nazi Germany. Here we were declaring our own personal war against not just the Tory-LibDem Coalition Government, but on the very serious world-wide financial system. A system which has created a world-wide free market and a few-rules system, which has a far greater risk than anything envisaged by Karl Marx. Global Capitalism left to its own devices has the potential of killing off the human race. As the late Tony Judt wrote in the opening paragraph of his very last book in 2009 Ill Fares The Land, "We can no longer continue to live our lives like this". I now write that Mankind has but a short time to respond positively and effectively. If the destruction of our natural environment and humanity itself is to be avoided!

This is a greater challenge than the Second World War which took over six weary years.

Food for thought - aimimg to provide food for humanity.


From Ken Curran, Chair Sheffield Co-operative Party Branch. Chair Manor & Castle Development Trust. Sheffield District Labour Party.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Manifestos Of Intent - Read These Before You Vote.



UPDATED AND ADJUSTED 29 AUGUST - THE FOLLOWING NOW INCLUDES MANIFESTO MATERIAL FROM ALL 5 CANDIDATES IN THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP ELECTION.

On 16 June we commenced a campaign to get the candidates in the Labour Leadership Election to issue what we called "Manifestos of Intent".

As time went on we came to feel that these Manifestos should be published at least a week before the ballot papers were due to be issued to members of the Labour Party. That made yesterday the deadline.

We are now able to present these Manifestos or provide relevant links to the candidates own web-sites where they have previously published this material themselves.

We cover each candidate in alphabetical order.

*****

DIANE ABBOTT



People’s Economic Strategy

We need to rebalance the economy away from an over reliance on financial services and the City. I would have a new approach: a manufacturing strategy; investment in infrastructure; support for the Green New Deal and a renewed commitment to regional economic development.

The Coalition’s savage cuts are not inevitable, they are ideological. And they are not the solution. We have to grow our way out of this recession. Instead, I would raise billions from a financial transactions tax and a bigger bank levy, and by cracking down on tax evasion. Why should ordinary families pay for bankers’ irresponsibility and greed?

Liberty is crucial to our democracy

Liberty is crucial to democracy and we need to take back the civil liberties agenda. Basic rights and freedoms will help to bind 21st century Britain together.

I was against compulsory ID Cards, anti trade union laws, 42 and 90 days detention without trial. I also argued against holding children in immigration detention centres. All my life I have campaigned to protect innocent people’s rights. I oppose the indiscriminate collection of innocent people’s DNA.

There is no contradiction between keeping Britain safe and protecting our basic rights and freedoms.

A Strong Welfare State That Protects The Most Vulnerable

I oppose cuts to pensions, benefits and welfare. These cuts will disproportionately affect women. A strong welfare state is a vital safety net. We must invest in the welfare state to increase social mobility.

The coalition wants to take security of tenure from council tenants and slash housing benefit. Thousands could find themselves homeless.

I would have the biggest programme of council house building since the war. It would meet housing need, ease social tensions over housing, create thousands of jobs and generate growth.

An Ethical Foreign Policy

I am the only candidate who argued, marched and voted against the Iraq War. I will set a timetable for the withdrawal from Afghanistan. We must work more closely with our European allies and the United Nations.

Trident is a Cold War weapon. It will not keep us safe. Strength in the modern world for the nation state is about diplomacy, development and aid. It is not about wasting billions on nuclear weapons we will never use. I will scrap the Trident nuclear weapons system.

Despite our current economic challenges, we should continue Labour’s proud tradition of reaching out to help the very poorest internationally.

Public Services For The People

The Labour party should be proud of its historic support for the public sector.We are the party of the National Health Service. But under New Labour there was too much creeping privatisation.

Public sector workers are at the heart of our communities. We should value them more. Why should they lose their jobs because some bankers gambled with other people’s money?

I would bring the railways back into public ownership. This would be a pragmatic step and would make it easier to invest in the infrastructure, help create green alternatives and jobs and brings profit back to the people.

This is her campaign web-site.

*****

ED BALLS

We have received this email from Ed Ball's Campaign Office -

Ed Balls has set out his Manifesto position "in the mailing to all party members .....which includes a mini-manifesto section on policy, plus a number of pledges re the Party itself. This can be read and downloaded here.

Ed’s speech at Bloomberg yesterday fleshes out the economic side of this in more detail and can be found here."

This is his campaign web-site.

*****

ANDY BURNHAM

He published his Manifesto entitled "Aspirational Socialism" on his web-site on Monday. We reported on it here. It is some 9,000 words long and can be viewed and downloaded here. This is the home page of his campaign web-site.

*****

ED MILIBAND

We received the following letter from Ed Miliband and have added links to the items from his web-site which he refers us to.

"Thank you for your letter and the views of the signatories to the statement you attach. I agree that we need now to have a serious discussion about what we got wrong in Government, and how we should stand up to the Coalition while preparing for a return to power. I have said repeatedly that I believe we need to put our core values at the heart of everything we do.

Early on in the campaign I set out my vision for the future direction of our Party, which I hope meets the requirements for your Manifesto of Intent. In a speech in Leeds, I reflected on the reasons behind our defeat in May and set out how we can learn lessons and reach out to the country again. A few weeks later, I gave a speech outlining how the Labour Party can adapt to 21st social democracy, to become a living, breathing party of progressive change. You can find both of these speeches on my website www.edmiliband.org

It could be a long road to the next General Election, but the change has to start now. In Government we sometimes seemed to lose a sense of the values that should always shape Labour's mission. As leader, I would put these values back at the heart of everything we do.

I want to lead a Party that actively turns its values into reality, to improve people's lives. We need to be ready to offer a better vision to the electorate. We need to have already shown by our actions and arguments that Britain needs a different kind of economy in which new manufacturing and small businesses are prized.

We can only do that by listening to our party and building a movement for change. I would appreciate your support to make this happen.

With best wishes,
Ed Miliband."

This is his campaign web-site.

*****

DAVID MILIBAND


My vision for Britain

No movement has done more to improve the lives of ordinary people – creating the NHS, building the welfare state and introducing the National Minimum Wage – than our Labour movement. And there is no greater danger to these achievements than a Tory Government. This Conservative Coalition is bringing the wrong change to our country.

We owe it to the people of Britain – to the men and women seeking work, to the pensioner worried about police cuts, to the student with no university place – to be the change Britain needs.

As I think of the challenges our country faces, I’m guided by my vision for the Britain I want to live in, the Britain I want to raise my children in and the Britain I seek to serve.

I believe in a Britain where power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many not the few.

I believe in a Britain where people earn a living wage and wealth is truly shared.

I believe in a Britain where everyone can benefit from work, with a new industrial revolution that supports manufacturing and creates, protects and improves jobs.

I believe in a Britain where the opportunity of world-class education and the guarantee of excellent health care are a birthright for all not the preserve of a few.

I believe in a Britain where families who need a home are not left to the chances of the market, and the welfare state protects better and also demands more in return.

I believe in a Britain where people have power in their communities, lives are not ruined by crime, liberty is real and we break the hopeless cycle of crime.

I believe in a Britain where people feel secure locally because they know Britain is effective globally on security, economy and climate change.

And it’s because I know this hope for Britain is shared by you, and needed by
our country, that we have a duty to win.


I'm asking for your support and your vote. And I'm asking you to join with me in building the movement for change that Britain needs.

The Cause worth fighting for
‘Power, wealth and opportunity… in the hands of the many not the few’. An inspirational phrase printed on each of our membership cards.

I will be the leader who puts Clause IV into action.

Power and security in every community
Labour was the first government since the Second World War to cut crime, and we devolved power to Scotland, Wales and London – but our work is far from finished. I would:
1. Give people more power over their public services and local government greater power to lead their communities.
2. Defend police numbers and the priority of tackling anti-social behaviour.
3. Ensure we build more council housing to rent and affordable housing to buy.

Wealth creation across the country
I would reduce the deficit by getting Britain growing and working, not by cutting the roots of our economy.
The Tory cuts hurt those least able to afford them and risk a second recession. I will:
1. Focus on returning Britain to full employment and achieving a fair deal for those who work the hardest.
2. Promote manufacturing through a new industrial revolution – starting by doubling the levy on banks and investing in green jobs.
3. Support a Mansion Tax on houses worth over £2m not the Tory cuts to family livelihoods.

Opportunity to tackle the gap in life chances
We improved education most in the poorest areas, but pupils from these schools are still least likely to go to top universities. Life expectancy is still too dependent on the postcode in which you live.
I will work to ensure that where you are born does not determine where you end up, through:
1. Recruiting the best teachers to the toughest schools, focusing pupils on learning not simply on exams, and expanding higher education and apprenticeships.
2. Fighting against the Tories’ attack on the NHS and prioritising public health to target all health inequalities.
3. Preventing the waste of worklessness by providing a job to anyone at risk of long-term unemployment and making sure they take it up.

This is his campaign web-site.

1 SEPTEMBER UPDATE : David Miliband has distributed a booklet by post which starts with the above material - mine arrived today (HB). The whole booklet can, therefore, be seen as an extended version of his Manifesto and should now be in the hands of Labour Party members.

Monday, August 23, 2010

We Have A Manifesto

In response to the campaign run by "Dronfield Blather", Andy Burnham has today issued a Manifesto setting out the programme he would seek to pursue if he is elected as leader of the Labour Party. It is some 9,000 words long and can be viewed and/or downloaded from his web-site. It is a serious contribution and should be studied by all those with votes in the leadership contest.

Andy describes his stance - "It begins with a definition of the philosophy that underpins my approach to politics and outlook on life. It is Aspirational Socialism. It means that we want all people to fulfil their hopes and dreams but knowing that this will only happen for those who have least if we work for a world where resources and power are shared".

It is hoped that the four other contestants will set out their stalls based on their own values and commitments. Later this week we will publish or provide links to any Manifesto material we have access to from them.

Eventually we will make our own assessment of the different cases which the five candidates argue.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Manifesto Momentum

Yesterday as part of his Labour Leadership Campaign, Andy Burnham circulated an email in which he stated - "Next week, I will set out in my manifesto how I intend to rebuild our great Party from the bottom up, as an open and vibrant campaigning force with power vested in the hands of our members. ..... My manifesto – ‘Aspirational Socialism’ – is a coherent political philosophy and vision for our country. Keep an eye on my website at www.andy4leader.com for more information. You will be able to download my manifesto to read at your leisure."

As we first reported on 2nd July, Andy's action is fully in line with a commitment he had then made to "Dronfield Blather". Following a further exchange of emails, he repeated his promise to us as recently as 6th August.

As soon as he issues his manifesto we will provide access to it on this site.

As we showed in the item we posted on 1st August, we also hold promises from the other four candidates that they will also issue Manifestos. We will send each candidate a link to this current item and press David, Diane and the two Eds to also deliver their Manifestos next week. Not least because the ballot papers in the contest are due to be circulated from 1st September. It would be good to have a chance to read and digest the Manifestos before then.

We initially ran a campaign for the issue of such Manifestos here.

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Now There Are Five

All five candidates for the Labour Leadership have now responded positively to the campaign run by Dronfield Blather to issue Manifestos of Intent. On Friday we reported that four out of the five were then on board, but afterwards the missing Ed Balls was approached at the close of the final hustings held at Manchester and he accepted our proposal.

It all reminds us of the first of Enid Blyton's books about the Famous Five. It was entitled "Five On A Treasure Island" and as is shown opposite. The cover of the book depicts Enid's missing character being safely brought aboard at the last moment.

However, the drama is not yet over. The five have all agreed to publish Manifestos of Intent. Three have confirmed this by email, one by a letter and the other face-to-face with Blogger Brader at Manchester.

But we only have until 16 August until the balloting commences. So we are keen to gain access to the finalised Manifestos themselves for publication by then. So far we hold some initial material from two of the candidates, although if they wish they still have time to elaborate on what we hold.

Whenever all five Manifestos are to hand we will publish them alongside each other. If anyone falls out of the boat we will, however, publish what we then hold on 16 August which is the date that balloting commences in the contest. We can't wait any longer than that.

Candidates are, of course, free to publish their own Manifestos at any time they wish. If they beat us to it, we will nevertheless stick to the above timetable.

UPDATE AND CORRECTION 3rd AUGUST.
The start of the ballot for individual members of the Labour Party has been changed from 16 August to 1 September. We hope, however, that the candidates will submit and/or issue their "Manifestos of Intent" well before the new date. People need time to examine and discuss Manifestos. So we will still seek to act in conformity with the time-table mentioned above.

UPDATE AND ALTERATION 5th AUGUST.
For what are called logistical reasons, the final date on which we hope to issue the candidates' Manifestos is now pushed back to 25 August. It is a good old fashioned compromise between the two dates mention in the earlier update. At least it shows that we are in communication with the high commands in the various candidates' camps.


Below - the famous five at their final hustings at Manchester.

Friday, July 30, 2010

The Glass Is 80% Full.

We now have the agreement of four out of five of the candidates in the Labour Party Leadership election to issue "Manifestos of Intent". The two Miliband bothers have joined Diane Abbott and Andy Burnham on this. The only person who has not yet replied to our repeated requests is Ed Balls. So I have emailed his wife on the matter. That should do the trick.

We would like to publish all five Manifestos together. This will be done as soon as they are all received, or we can link to them. But we can't wait until after the balloting commences on 16 August. If we don't have a full hand of Manifestos by then, we will publish what we hold and explain the efforts we engaged in to get the rest.

At the moment we hold material from two of the candidates, so we will not finish up being empty handed. Any candidate is, of course, free to publish a Manifesto themselves whenever they wish.



We have asked Yvette to have another word with Ed.

Monday, July 19, 2010

WELCOME ON BOARD DIANE AND ANDY

Diane Abbott (left) has agreed to issue a "Manifesto of Intent" in line with our campaign.

This means that Diane joins Andy Burnham (right) in responding positively to our proposal.

We are still waiting to hear from Ed Balls, Ed Miliband and David Miliband. At least two of these have been approached on the matter at meetings and the third should have been nobbled by a friendly Labour MP.

Perhaps 5 out of 5 is just around the corner. But keep the support coming in, so they can't forget.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Questions For The Leadership Candidates

We should have held a Discussion Meeting today, but the World Cup Final has got in the way.

Instead here are some pertinent questions for the Labour Party leadership candidates from one of our regular attenders SNOWY WILLIAMS.



"In your scheme of things -

(1) Will the former Clause 4 be re-introduced into the Labour Party's aims and objectives?

(2) Will words like socialism and socialist appear in your literature?

(3) Will local constituency parties be given greater control over their choice of candidates?

(4) Will you spell out in unambiguous DETAIL the relationship that you aim to establish between the Trade Unions and the Labour Party?

(5) Will Trade Unions be able to offer direct sponsorship to candidates of their choosing for parliamentary elections?

(6) Will you abandon the policy of handing over schools to private bodies for profit?

(7) What are your attitudes towards re-nationalising transport, gas, electricity and the water supply?"

Further contributions from Snowy appear here and here.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Support from the Socialist Health Association

The Socialist Health Association is backing the call initiated on Dronfield Blather which seeks to get the candidates in the Labour leadership elections each to issue a "Manifesto of Intent". This is the first organisation affiliated to the Labour Party to do this. We are seeking support from others. Andy Burnham is the only candidate so far to have accepted this call.

Friday, July 2, 2010

One Accepts. Four Reminded.

The call which appears on the thread below this one, has received a positive response from Andy Burnham (photo) and has the backing of John McDonnell. It is a request for the candidates in the labour leadership contest to issue "Manifestos of Intent" related to the democratic socialist principles contained on the back of Labour Party Membership Cards.


The other four candidates have today been sent this fresh email -

"Dear Diane Abbott, Ed Balls, David Miliband and Ed Miliband,

A fortnight ago I emailed then posted you a request to issue a "Manifesto of Intent" for the Labour Leadership Campaign. Manifestos which it was hoped would be issued widely amongst those with votes in the selection. I also handed a copy of the request to David Miliband that day, at a meeting he addressed in Sheffield.

So far Andy Burnham has responded favourably to this request, so I am sending him and his campaign team a copy of this email.

I hope that each of you will now agree to our suggestion.

Full details of our proposal are provided here, listing those who are backing us -
http://dronfieldblather.blogspot.com/2010/06/calling-those-with-voting-rights-in.html

All the best,
Harry Barnes (Labour MP 1987-2005),
http://threescoreyearsandten.blogspot.com/
(Address, email and phone number also supplied)."

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Calling Those With Voting Rights In The Labour Leadership Contest - But It Is Not Your Vote We Are After.


The letter below is being submitted to the five candidates for the Labour Leadership - who are shown above. If you are a member of an organisation which has voting rights in this election, then why not add your support via the comment box on this thread? Give your name and list the relevant organisations which you are a member of. These include Constituency Labour Parties, the Co-operative Party and affiliated bodies such as many Trade Unions and various Socialist Societies. The type of details we are after are limited to those shown for signatories at the close of the letter. This comment box takes information from anyone with an email facility. Other signatories will be added as they are received. As a consequence this thread is being periodically updated.

TO THE CANDIDATES IN THE LABOUR LEADERSHIP ELECTIONS

The supporters of this letter are members of either the Labour Party and/or members of organisations affiliated to the Labour Party who pay their political levy or its equivalent.

Immediately after the election we felt that Labour needed a period of reflection and serious internal debate to assess the reasons for our defeat and to think through the direction we needed to move into.

Instead we have been confronted with an imperfect leadership contest in which the Party’s wider membership and its affiliated bodies have been excluded from the nominating procedure. This has restricted both the range of the political viewpoints and the background links of the candidates who have emerged.

What we feel now needs to be done is to seek to use the current imperfect leadership contest as a means by which we can acquire something like the form of assessment and internal debate which we feel is necessary.

This means that there is a need to divert the current contest away from being just another ’X factor’ game show, towards being a serious debate related to the principles contained in the Labour Party Constitution which state - “The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It believes that by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone, so as to create for each of us the means to realise our true potential and for all of us a community in which power, wealth and opportunity are in the hands of the many not the few, where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe, and where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect”.

To help achieve the depth and nature of the debate that we are seeking, we call upon each of the candidates to publish a Manifesto of Intent to make clear to everyone the direction in which they would seek to lead the Labour Party, based on their assessment of the reasons behind the electoral defeat and their interpretation of the direction where the principles quoted above should now lead us.

We ask that these Manifestos of Intent should be distributed widely in order to generate extensive discussion across the Party and beyond, so that this will assist those voting in the leadership contest to reach balanced and principled understandings.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We invite Labour Party members, members of the Co-operative Party and those who pay their political levy to Trade Unions affiliated to the Labour Party (or the equivalent) to add their names and their organisational links to this letter via the Comment Box.

(1) Ken Curran, Birley Branch LP, Sheffield South East CLP, UNISON, Co-operative Party Sheffield Branch.

(2) John Halstead, Nether Edge Branch LP, Sheffield Central CLP, Cooperative Party Sheffield Branch.

(3) Harry Barnes, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE, Co-operative Party Chesterfield Branch, Labour MP 1987-2005.

(4) Martin Brader, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(5) John Dunn, West Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(6) Graham Baxter MBE, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE. Leader NE Derbyshire District Council.

(7) Jon Williams, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(8) Shelagh Wolliscroft, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(9) Roy Pilkington, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(10) Stephen Brunt, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(11) John Gilbert, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(12) Bill Michie, Nether Edge LP, Sheffield Central CLP, UNITE, Co-operative Party Sheffield Branch, Labour MP 1983-2001.

(13) Bob Piper, Abbey Branch LP, Warley CLP.

(14) Mick Davies, Bristnall Branch LP, Warley CLP.

(15) Shay Boyle, Sutton Branch LP, Bolsover CLP, GMB.

(16) Frances Kelly, Finchley and Golders Green CLP.

(17) Patricia Williams, Sutton Branch LP, Bolsover CLP, UNISON.

(18) Steve Thompson, Sheffield Central Branch LP and CLP, Co-operative Party Sheffield Branch.

(19) Dr Duncan Hall, Skipton Branch LP, Skipton and Ripon CLP.

(20) Douglas Michael Chewter, Skipton and Ripon CLP.

(21) Marianne Quick, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(22) Ian Robathan, Pheasey Branch LP, Walsall CLP.

(23) Jack Wearing, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(24) Doreen Curran, Berwick-upon-Tweed Branch LP, Berwick CLP, NUPE Retired Member.

(25) Ronald Curran, Berwick-upon-Tweed Branch LP, Berwick CLP, NUPE Retired Member.

(26) Gary Kent, Beckenham CLP, UNITE, NUJ.

(27) Christine Smith, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNISON.

(28) Caroline Smith, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(29) Rosie Smith, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(30) Barry Winter, Chapel Allerton Branch LP, Leeds North East CLP, ILP.

(31) Frank Abel, Manor and Castle Branch LP, Sheffield Central CLP, NUT.

(32) William Brown, Sheffield Hallam CLP, ILP.

(33) Felix Gott, Hornsey and Wood Green CLP.

(34) James Vernoit, Vauxhall CLP.

(35) Rebecca Eeley, Cheadle CLP, Fabian Society.

(36) Bernadette Duffy, Birley Branch LP, South East Sheffield CLP.

(37) Gordon MacMillan, St Ann's, Tottenham CLP.

(38) Dave Hill, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, UNITE.

(39) Janet Hill, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(40) Caz Brader, Manchester Withington CLP. CYWU.

(41) Samuel Ohene, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(42) John McDonnell M.P., Hayes and Harlington CLP.

(43) Edna Woodhead, Ecclesall Branch LP, Sheffield Hallam CLP.

(44) John Woodhead, Ecclesall Branch LP, Sheffield Hallam CLP.

(45) George Bell, UNISON Bassetlaw Local Government Retired Member.

(46) Paul Harman, Darlington CLP.

(47) James Doran, Darlington CLP, Co-operative Party Darlington & South Durham Branch.

(48) Bob Gachagan, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, GMB.

(49) Ann Barnes, Dronfield Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, GMB.

(50) Martin Stone, Chesterfield CLP, UNISON.

(51) Socialist Health Association.

(52) Pete Firmin, Hampstead & Kilburn CLP. CWU.

(53) Val Graham, Chesterfield CLP, UNISON.

(54) Stan Newens, Harlow CLP, Labour MP 1964-70 and 1974-83, Labour MEP 1984-99.

(55) Derek Bunce, Haywood & Hixon Branch LP, Stafford CLP, UNISON.

(56) Paul Cotterill, Leader Labour Group on West Lancashire Borough Council in a personal capacity.

(57) Simon Whitten, South West Bedfordshire CLP.

(58) Ian Woodland, Southampton Itchen CLP, UNITE.

(59) Andreas Paterson, Norwich South CLP.

(60) Jon Taylor, Chair Wharley Bridge Branch LP, High Peak Constituency.

(61) Mark Grayling, Grassmoor Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP, Chesterfield Co-operative Party.

(62) Tom Gann, Greenwich & Woolwich CLP, Fabian Society, Parliamentary Candidate for Salisbury in the General Election.

(63) James McGee, Salisbury CLP, Fabian Society.

(64) Vino Sangarapillai, Horsey & Wood Green CLP, UNISON.

(65) Anthony Mckeown, High Peak CLP, UNITE, Co-operative Party Chesterfield Branch.

(66) Ruth Stoba, Whaley Bridge Branch LP, High Peak CLP.

(67) Kingston & Surbiton Constituency Labour Party, (posted by Max Freedman Chair)

(68) Stephanie David, Bexleyheath & Crayford CLP, GMB.

(69) Robert Naether disabled GMB Union south wales.

(70) Alex Williams, Stockport CLP.

(71) Steve Pickering, Eckington Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

(72) Bob Heath. Eckington Branch LP, NE Derbyshire CLP.

Monday, May 31, 2010

Who Are The Milibands?

Details of the next Disussion Meeting of the Dronfield Labour Party are given below. These meetings are open to members of the Labour Party and to members of the Dronfield Contact Club. They are open to others by invitation.


SPEAKER............John Halstead

TOPIC..................Who are the Milibands?

TIME....................8 pm to 9.15 pm

DATE...................Sunday, 13th June 2010

VENUE.................Contact Club, Snape Hill Lane, Dronfield



This meeting provides an opportunity to discuss the Labour leadership issue and the current direction of Labour politics.

The Miliband brothers, David and Ed appear to be the two front-runners in the Labour Party leadership contest. Their late father, Ralph Miliband was a leading Marxist intellectual at the London School of Economics (LSE), before moving to the University of Leeds. Ralph said his sons provided 'stringent criticisms' of his views. How might the views of his two sons relate to those of their father?

The discussion will be introduced by John Halstead who studied at the LSE under Ralph Miliband's personal supervision. John formerly taught adult students (workers in the mines and steel works, on the railways and in public services) at the University of Sheffield. He has been prominent for many years in the work of the Society for the Study of Labour History.



The late Ralph Miliband on the left and his two sons Ed and David below.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Election Inquest - Is there a void in the mind of the Left?

From Ken Curran (left).


The Polls have just closed. I am, therefore, not yet in a position to be able to know whether Labour has the largest number of MPs, whether we have a hung parliament, or whether we have finished up in third place. But what I do know is that this has been a terrible election, not just for the Labour Party but for the future of progressive politics.

Whilst the novelty of the TV debates could have raised some excitement amongst sections of the electorate, nobody can genuinely claim they were designed to raise the levels of political enlightenment. They were just another TV Game Show.

To understand why Labour is likely to have done so badly in the election, we need a sense of labour history in order to understand where its malaise had its roots.

Labour stood to be beaten long before the election was called. For years there has been a growing gulf between the Labour Party and its natural supporters. This has not just been a political gulf; every bit as important has been the cultural gulf. Over the past 30 to 40 years, too many Labour MPs have tried to emulate to the rich in dress, lifestyle and outlook. They have regarded politics as a career, not seeing themselves as the advocates of the poor. They have not acted on behalf of those whose problems arise from the operations of the current system of free market capitalism. They have failed to recognise the damage the free market does to those at the bottom of the economic pile. They have personally distanced themselves as far away as possible from those people they perceive as failures. New Labour has failed to recognise that the very economic system it put its faith in to produce a Golden Age of Post Blairism is itself fundamentally flawed.

People were never left in any doubt by Keir Hardie as to who he represented in Parliament. I feel that he would not have wished to have been seen dead with many of today's Labour aspirants. Nor would I.

Labour, the Tories and the Lib Dems have tried to build three separate false perspectives. Each, however, presuming that economic and social progress will come as a pre-ordained gift provided we only vote for them. None of the parties have attempted to present the electorate with a vision for the future.

Whilst Brown did make several attempts to steer debate around to economic issues, both Cameron and Clegg avoided engagement on the issue. This meant that without seeing any serious debate, a mainly politically immature electorate were more easily seduced by the two younger and photogenic challengers for Downing Street. Given the nature of the TV coverage, hormones played the major role.

The big question at this important juncture is how do we begin to tackle the void in British politics which is the absence of democratic socialism from the centre stage.

A pointer is provided in an article by Matthew Brown entitled "The Void In The Mind Of The Left" which appears in the Spring Edition of Democratic Socialism. A version of his article can be found here here on the web-site of Independent Labour Publications.

His article is a response to the Compass Summer Lecture in September 2009 on "The Future of Social Democracy" by Jon Cruddas - which is printed as the first article here. In his address Cruddas had called for a realignment of social democracy and social liberalism constructed on what he called the four pillars of progressive politics - equality, community, sustainability and democracy. Under these banners he set out what he calls "a programme for the centre left".

Listening to the talk, Matthew Brown regards Cruddas's programme as little more than a series of leftish sounding demands for reforms; including anything from Compass's much trumpeted High Pay Commission to greater tax justice, scrapping Trident and the third runway at Heathrow, integrated transport, constitutional change including proportional representation and so on.

None of these will answer Mrs Duffy of Rochdale or the poor on the Manor Estate at Sheffield.

Following Jon Cruddas's talk a number of people contributed from the platform. It was Professor Massey who identified the lack of a political strategy in what had been said, claiming that a shopping list of electoral demands would not create a basis for viable politics. Whilst she was well disposed to many of the calls for radicalism from Cruddas, she felt that without a political strategy to support such a programme, it would ultimately fail as (by itself) it would create enemies. She felt that there was a need to go beyond parties and parliament to build a cultural and political movement as a means of bringing about wider and deeper social change.

I conclude from the forgoing remark that without a fully thought through programme and an accompanying strategy, the chances of a future radical Labour Government capable of being able to change the behaviour of capitalism are nil. The first challenge as I see it is to educate the electorate. As Professor Massey pointed out "Labour has been so used to having a natural social base it has no idea how to construct a new one". She claimed that "work has to be put in to establish a new common sense, because that is what he (Cruddas) is calling for. The current common sense took a concerted effort over years - not just the big set piece battles but the drip, drip, drip of arguments and constant assertions".

In 1992 I wrote a discussion paper entitled "Re-vitalising Labour". My opening sentence was - "We must return to the streets as the Party of protest, giving expression to the concerns of the people". We cannot wait for some political event or opportunity to arise before we act. Over the past few years the Party has almost suppressed its natural inclination to show anger in public. We became more concerned with image than we were with the many violations against working people perpetuated by Thatcher and her band of pirates.

Because we wanted respectability from the establishment, our supporters were left on their own. We have to been seen physically both supporting and leading people in their daily trials for them to recognise that Labour is really on their side.

When Professor Massey stated the need to go beyond parliament and political parties to build a cultural and political movement to bring about wider and deeper social change, then personally I feel that she is right. Perhaps we need the formation of a new Chartist Movement to operate beyond the current political parties. With clearly declared objectives, perhaps set in a time-scale it could become a massive public pressure group. Its size would force all political parties to have due regard for its views and demands.(The original Chartists in 1848).

If such a movement had been formed well in advance and in sufficient depth, then perhaps Blair would not have been able to join Bush in his Iraq war. I can think of a number of times when the existence of a new Chartist Movement could have influenced the Government. The most recent could have been over the banking system and the bonus's paid to executive directors. It has not just been Labour voters who have been angry over these issues. I am sure that there are many Tory voters who are angry over the arrogance of bankers and big business bosses. These discontented people have a key role to play if we ever hope to change the behaviour of capitalism.

We need a wide debate on the future of what is a fragile democracy. We can at least do our own bit in the light of today's election results. Others are welcome to participate. See here also.

Ken Curran Snr, Chair of the Sheffield Co-operative Party. Sheffield District Labour Party. Writing in a personal capacity.

On Sunday evening, the Dronfield Labour Party Discussion Group (seen below) will be discussing the consequences of the General Election Result for Labour. Roger Barton our former MEP will be the speaker whilst Ken Curran will be present to argue for his above concerns. This could well be the first grass roots reaction in the Labour Party to the new situation. (See the right hand panel for details).

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

See You On May 6th At 10pm

Due to the General Election no further items will be posted on this site until the close of the polls at 10pm on May 6th.

Friday, April 2, 2010

Sheffield TUC - Events of interest

Events of interest – 5th April,2010.
Information from the Sheffield TUC.
April to July,2010: Sheffield Trade Union Studies Centre Union
Learn Courses For Trade Union Representatives,Health & Safety
Representatives, and Union Learning Representatives. For information
regarding Courses contact:- Trade Union Studies Centre, The Sheffield
College, Skills For Business, Learoyd Way,Hillsborough Barracks,
Sheffield, S6 2LR. Tel 01142602404. E-mail tony.fletcher@sheffcol.ac.uk
10th April,2010: National March & Rally on “Defending State &
Public Services.” Assemble: 12.00 Noon for 1.00 P.M. at Temple Place on
The Embankment. Then March to Rallly in Trafalgar Square.
A FREE BUS provided by Sheffield TUC will depart at 7.00 A.M from
opposite the Queen`s Hotel (near to the Interchange).
To book seats telephone Ray Jackson on 0114 2345121.
12th April,2010: Sheffield Unite Against Fascism Public Meeting.
7.30 P.M. Victoria Hall, Norfolk Street,Sheffield.
13th April, 2010: Sheffield Unite Against Fascism leafletting.
Meet at 5.00 P.M. outside BCAF,Spital Hill,S4 7LG.
15 th April,2010: Public Pre-General Election Meeting Organised by
The Leeds Branch of ASLEF. 6.30 P.M. to 8.30 P.M., City Chambers,
Leeds Civic Hall,Millennium Square,Leeds, LS2 3AD.
Chairperson: Nick Whitehead, District Organiser,ASLEF;
Speakers: Bill Adams, TUC Regional Secretary; Rosie Winterton,M.P.;
Tosh Mc Donald, Vice-President, ASLEF;
Jane Thomas, Prospective Labour Parliamentary Candidate,Keighley;
Pauline Cawood, Branch Secretary, Leeds Branch,ASLEF.
17 th April,2010: “ Love Music Hate Racism - Stop The BNP- Make
Sure You Vote!” 8.00 P.M. to 2.00 A.M., West Indian Centre,
Laycock Place, Chapeltown,Leeds.
Waged £8./Unwaged £5. Contact: 0788638736.
22 nd April,2010 : W.E.A. Education Course on “Talking Politics.”
The Course will be held from 10.00 A.M. To 12.00 Noon on Thursdays for
10 weeks from this commencment date at Sheffield Independent
Film,5,Brown Street, Sheffield,S1,. Enquiries about the Course are
obtainable from Paul Boizot,The Tutor, on 01904 621510 and
www.paulboizot.co.uk/course.htm.
24TH April,2010: The Nottinghamshire & Derbyshire History
Society will present a talk on:”Our First World War Heroines -
The Canary Girls of Chilwell.” The talk will commence at 2.00 P.M. and
be held in the Mechanics Institute, 3,North Sherwood Street,
Nottingham. The Canary Girls, who worked in the Chilwell Munitions
Factory, were so named because of their being in contact with TNT their
skins turned into an orange yellow colour. During July,1918, eight tons
of TNT exploded and 134 workers were killed and 250 workers were
injured. The dead were buried in a mass grave at Attenborough. The
authorites attempted to cover up this horrendous disaster and it took
fifty years of campaigning before a Memorial to the dead was erected.
For further information regarding this Event please telephone Hillary
Cave on 01246 270628 or E-mail: hilary.cave@btinternet.com.
26 th April,2010: 2010 General Election Hustings Meeting
organised by the National Union of Teachers. 7.00 P.M. (Reception at
6.30 P.M. with tea and biscuits), Friends Meeting House,St.James Street
(Near Cathedral). “WHAT FUTURE FOR EDUCATION UNDER THE NEXT
GOVERNMENT?” Come and hear the debate and put your questions to
Sheffield candidates, namely:- * Paul Scriven, Liberal Democrat
Candidate for Sheffield Central; * Paul Blomfield,Labour candidate for
Sheffield Central; * Maxine Bowler, Trade Union and Socialist Coalition,
Sheffield Brightside; * Julian Creasy, Green Party candidate for
Sheffield Central; * Conservative Party Speaker to be arranged; and
Sheffield National Union of Teachers Speaker.
27 th April,2010: Sheffield Trades Union Council Delegate Meeting.
7.00 P.M. Trades & Labour Club (Talbot Street entrance). All Trade Union
Branches are urged to affiliate to the Sheffield Trades Union Council in
order that their representatives may attend Delegate Meetings and
share experiences and problems with Delegates from other Trade Union
Branches, professions and industries. Trade Union Branches wishing
to affiliate to the Sheffield Trades Union Council please contact: The
Secretary,Sheffield Trades Union Council, Trades & Labour Club, Talbot
Street, Sheffield, S2 2TG
(Tel. 0114 2750744 or 2349737).
28th April,2010: The Sheffield International Workers` Memorial
Day Ceremony will be held at The Workers` Memorial Tree situated in
front of the Town Hall. The Ceremony will commence at 12.30 P.M. and
be Addressed by The Lord Mayor of Sheffield and a number of other
Speakers. Trade unions and organisations which support health and
safety at work are requested to support the Ceremony by ensuring a
good attendance and by providing wreaths and flowers.
REMEMBER THE DEAD – DEFEND THE LIVING!
1 s t May,2010 : Leeds Trades Union Council May Day March and
Rally. “Public Services Not Private Profit.” Assemble 11.30 A.M. in front
of the Art Gallery. COME AND JOIN US WITH YOUR BANNERS!
1 s t May,2010: “Love Music Hate Racism – Northern Carnival”
Barnsley Town Centre will host some of the U.K.`s top live acts and
D.J.s. The Carnival will be jointly organised by the Barnsley
Metropolitan Borough Council and Love Music – Hate Racism. This will
be Barnsley`s biggest ever day of music and there will something for
everyone. Additionallly, there will also be The Festival Fringe with over
40 bands on 19 venues across the Town. This is a non-profit Event and
£8 tickets are available from the Barnsley Metrodome Tel.0845 838 4519
and from other venues in Barnsley. Early booking is advised.
3rd May,2010: Chesterfield Trades Union Council May Day March &
Rally. Assemble: 10.30 A.M. Town Hall. Rally: 12.00 Noon - New Square.
3 rd May,2010: ”Coal Not Dole.” Film on the 1984/1985 Miners`
Strike- The Strikers` Story. Free Admission. 1.00 P.M., North East
Derbyshire Council Chamber, Chesterfield. This Event is to be
organised by the Chesterfield & District TUC and Graysons, Solicitors.
3rd July, 2010: South Yorkshire Festival held at Wortley Hall from
12.00 Noon to 5.00 P.M.. This is the largest and most popular Annual
Trade Union and Labour Movement Event in South Yorkshire. It is an
Event where ordinary working people and their families and friends
enjoy themselves in the settings of Wortley Hall and its 27 acres of
formal and landscaped gardens.
10TH July, 2010: Durham Miners` Gala.The Gala goes back
to 1871 when the first Gala was held in Wharton Park in Durham with
Speakers from Barnsley, Glasgow, Staffordshire and Sunderland. In
recent years, due to Prime Ministers Blair and Brown declining
invitations to Address the Gala it is usually exclusively Addressed by
Real Labour Speakers such as Dennis Skinner,M.P. and Tony Benn.
Being attended by around 70,000 people the Durham Miners` Gala is
believed to be the largest annual industrial and political gathering in the
whole of Europe.